News
Opinion
The ‘reverse discrimination’ US Supreme Court ruling could’ve been much worse
The headline is correct; the court held unanimously that a straight woman who claimed she was discriminated against by her boss, who is a lesbian, can bring a claim and need not meet a higher burden of proof than an employee who is a member of a minority group.
Supreme Court ruling makes it easier to claim reverse discrimination at work
The U.S. Supreme Court has revived a case from Ohio where a woman claims she was denied a job and later demoted because she is straight—part of a decision that could make it easier for workers to bring reverse discrimination claims.
As the Supreme Court bears down on the most contentious stretch of its annual session, the justices have been taking detours ...
High court levels the legal playing field, saying that everyone deserves the same protection from discrimination, including ...
The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win ...
The US Supreme Court revived a job-bias lawsuit by a woman who says she suffered so-called reverse discrimination because she ...
The court ruled in favor of Marlean Ames, who says she was passed over for professional opportunities as a straight person in ...
The Supreme Court on Thursday made it easier for members of so-called majority groups to bring discrimination cases, but ...
EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas applauded the US Supreme Court’s ruling that revived a heterosexual woman’s job bias case as ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback