Pam Bondi “could have tried” Jeffrey Epstein while she was Florida Attorney General between 2011 and 2019, according to a law professor. President Donald Trump’s embattled Attorney General has been mired in controversy over the release of the Epstein files, which she claimed were sitting on her desk in February.

The Justice Department said unsealing grand jury transcripts related to Epstein's case is necessary given "longstanding and legitimate" public interest in the case.

After a months-long review of evidence in the government’s possession, the Justice Department determined that no “further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.”

The attorney general has come under fire over her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein controversy, with a recent poll showing her approval dropping.

Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer had tanked his own case, The Post sued. Now Bondi's petition is citing the case.

For more than a week, the MAGA world has been ablaze over the fact that Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to release the Jeffrey Epstein files despite promising to do so just a few months ago. Now, new evidence puts that decision in a new light.

The Justice Department's alleged lack of transparency in its Epstein memo has sparked frustration among many Trump supporters.

Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed to possess Jeffrey Epstein's "client list," sparking controversy and conspiracy theories. The DOJ and FBI refuted the existence of such a list after an exhaustive investigation. The White House deflected questions about Bondi's claims, referring inquiries back to her.