Before generative AI, if you wanted an inexpensive way to build out ... No, what triggered the reversal wasn’t faulty output—but an outright revolt from within. Wikipedia’s editorial process runs on a ...

Wikipedia's plan to roll out AI summaries wasn’t the only thing editors had gripes about, though. Wikipedia has in some ways become a byword for sober boringness, which is excellent.

Wikipedia Editors Revolt Over AI Summaries They've now been halted, pending further review. By Jon Martindale June 12, 2025 ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

Wikipedia is literally Generative Human Intelligence. There's no unqiue research, thoughts, or conclusions in there. It's a human-generated response to a request for information that uses other ...

AI summaries are all up in our search engines these days, and I think it's fair to say the response has been varied to date. The Wikipedia editor community, however, appears to have taken a strong ...

Wikipedia already uses AI to detect vandalism, translate content and predict readability, but up until the announcement, it had not offered AI services to its editors.

The nonprofit behind Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years — and it’s not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial ...

Inside Wikipedia’s AI revolt—and what it means for the media. Pete Pachal . Tue, Jul 1, 2025, 4:00 AM 5 min read.

Before generative AI, if you wanted an inexpensive way to build out lots of content, you launched a wiki. You’d spin up a site—broad or niche—and throw the doors open for anyone to edit. Be ...